Understanding how nature is valued and how this shapes governance becomes crucial. This matters because how nature is valued influences what becomes visible in policymaking, which harms are treated as acceptable, which protections are considered justified, and whose interests are effectively represented.
EU law and policy already recognise the importance of nature in multiple ways. The challenge is to translate these commitments more consistently into decision-making, especially under conditions of ecological interdependence, biodiversity loss, climate instability, systemic risk, and ecological limits. Furthermore, values that can be measured, monetised, standardised, or traded off often gain more institutional weight than values that are relational, place-specific, ethically significant, ecologically non-substitutable, or difficult to express in common metrics.
Moreover, under conditions of geopolitical instability, economic pressure, industrial competition, and social strain, ecological sustainability risks being reframed as a secondary objective.
Therefore, based on ethical analysis, the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies recommends that EU policymakers should:
to
at
to
to
This site uses cookies to store and access information about your device.