December 2016

Gene Editing

The technology has changed very significantly over the last 40 years as we have learned to understand more of the processes by which genetic material is altered in microorganisms, plants and animals and it is now possible to precisely insert or delete sequences of DNA in situ. This forty year old global consensus on prohibiting human germline gene modification has come under significant pressure in 2015.

For some members of the EGE, human germline gene modification for reproductive purposes cannot be ethically justified; they therefore call for upholding the prohibition that reflects, among others, Art. 3 of the European Charter of Fundamental Rights; because of the blurring lines between basic and applied research, some also call for a moratorium on any basic research involving human germline gene modification until the regulatory framework is adjusted to the new possibilities. For other members of the EGE, there may be positions worth considering which would justify continued research. As is the case in the scientific community at large, diverse views are represented in the group. We call for a broad public debate on these issues and are convinced that the EGE will make a useful contribution to these deliberations. In view of the above considerations, we urge the European Commission to request that the EGE succeeding the current group, as a matter of priority, consider the inextricably linked ethical, scientific and regulatory issues pertaining to germline and somatic cell gene modification.

On this page

Delivered on
31 December 2016
Origin
Requested by the European Commission

Core advice

The European Group on Ethics gave advice in the form of an Opinion, including policy recommendations. More about how we develop our advice >

Supporting work

To support the Group in its work, the EGE secretariat provided an analysis of the policy landscape. More about our knowledge-gathering >